<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Cornerstone Group</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cornerstone-group.org.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cornerstone-group.org.uk</link>
	<description>Faith, Flag, and Family</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 00:57:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are Christians Being Persecuted? by Edward Leigh MP by Nilsa</title>
		<link>http://cornerstone-group.org.uk/2010/04/07/are-christians-being-persecuted-by-edward-leigh-mp/#comment-1901</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilsa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 00:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cornerstonegroup.wordpress.com/?p=1490#comment-1901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you the father Bob that use to be in St. Mary in Bolivar, TN?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you the father Bob that use to be in St. Mary in Bolivar, TN?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The 20 Weeks Campaign &#8211; by Nadine Dorries MP by Joanne Bradley</title>
		<link>http://cornerstone-group.org.uk/2008/05/14/the-20-weeks-campaign-by-nadine-dorries-mp/#comment-1900</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joanne Bradley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cornerstonegroup.wordpress.com/?p=653#comment-1900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it makes sense to lower the 24 week limit to 20. I am fully for choice for women but in this current day of technology when babies are often surviving at 24 weeks and even earlier, I do believe it to be utterly wrong to end a life at  this stage unless for serious health issues with the mother or serious disability with the foetus. Nobody is wanting to ban abortion altogether, but just lower the time to a stage in the foetus&#039;s development when it has no chance to survive independantly, this is still giving women 4 months to decide, which is still more than any other european country.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it makes sense to lower the 24 week limit to 20. I am fully for choice for women but in this current day of technology when babies are often surviving at 24 weeks and even earlier, I do believe it to be utterly wrong to end a life at  this stage unless for serious health issues with the mother or serious disability with the foetus. Nobody is wanting to ban abortion altogether, but just lower the time to a stage in the foetus&#8217;s development when it has no chance to survive independantly, this is still giving women 4 months to decide, which is still more than any other european country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Comment of the day: Police arrest BBC veteran Ray Gosling over &#8216;I killed lover&#8217; claim &#8211; by Fay Schlesinger in the Daily Mail by Efrain Ahluwalia</title>
		<link>http://cornerstone-group.org.uk/2010/02/18/comment-of-the-day-police-arrest-bbc-veteran-ray-gosling-over-i-killed-lover-claim-by-fay/#comment-1899</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Efrain Ahluwalia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 04:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cornerstonegroup.wordpress.com/?p=1420#comment-1899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good explanation. I enjoy read it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1441326/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Martha&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good explanation. I enjoy read it <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1441326/" rel="nofollow">Martha</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How many people live in Britain – by Greg Hands MP by nick</title>
		<link>http://cornerstone-group.org.uk/2008/02/25/how-many-people-live-in-britain-%e2%80%93-by-greg-hands-mp/#comment-1897</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 13:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cornerstonegroup.wordpress.com/?p=584#comment-1897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[well done fahil]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well done fahil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The BBC – more ‘impartial’ on some issues than others – by Edward Leigh MP by Rangler</title>
		<link>http://cornerstone-group.org.uk/2009/01/28/the-bbc-%e2%80%93-more-%e2%80%98impartial%e2%80%99-on-some-issues-than-others-%e2%80%93-by-edward-leigh-mp/#comment-1895</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rangler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 07:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cornerstonegroup.wordpress.com/?p=957#comment-1895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of the panoply of website I&#039;ve pored over this has the most veiratcy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of the panoply of website I&#8217;ve pored over this has the most veiratcy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Statement by Edward Leigh on Same-sex Marriage &amp; Civil Partnerships by Harry</title>
		<link>http://cornerstone-group.org.uk/2011/02/17/statement-by-edward-leigh/#comment-1891</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cornerstonegroup.wordpress.com/?p=1749#comment-1891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Tory

The idea that marriage is a religious institution is quite laughable and rather a good illustration of how out of touch with reality you people are. We have had civil marriage in GB since 1837. 

And the idea that the non-religious (the majority of marriages as you seem top ignore are non-religious)  who have a civil marriage are not married or less married is not only offensive but more to the point contrary to the civil rights of those who are exercising the right not to hold a faith.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tory</p>
<p>The idea that marriage is a religious institution is quite laughable and rather a good illustration of how out of touch with reality you people are. We have had civil marriage in GB since 1837. </p>
<p>And the idea that the non-religious (the majority of marriages as you seem top ignore are non-religious)  who have a civil marriage are not married or less married is not only offensive but more to the point contrary to the civil rights of those who are exercising the right not to hold a faith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Statement by Edward Leigh on Same-sex Marriage &amp; Civil Partnerships by Adrian Butterworth</title>
		<link>http://cornerstone-group.org.uk/2011/02/17/statement-by-edward-leigh/#comment-1890</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Butterworth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 12:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cornerstonegroup.wordpress.com/?p=1749#comment-1890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;He argues that the very *institution* of marriage is undermined by this approach – which it is.&quot;

The idea that the tories are doing away with &#039;Traditional Marriage&#039; is frankly laughable. Gay marriage is just the end game for an institution that &#039;no-fault&#039; divorce and feminist family courts have long since completely corrupted. It&#039;s funny how most &#039;&#039;social conservatives&#039;&#039; in America and Britain continue to miss this obvious point. Gays aren&#039;t interested in &#039;traditional marriage&#039; only the heavily adulterated version we have today. Aside from that, why on earth would Mr Leigh be &#039;astonished&#039; that his left-liberal party is pursuing left-liberal legislation?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;He argues that the very *institution* of marriage is undermined by this approach – which it is.&#8221;</p>
<p>The idea that the tories are doing away with &#8216;Traditional Marriage&#8217; is frankly laughable. Gay marriage is just the end game for an institution that &#8216;no-fault&#8217; divorce and feminist family courts have long since completely corrupted. It&#8217;s funny how most &#8221;social conservatives&#8221; in America and Britain continue to miss this obvious point. Gays aren&#8217;t interested in &#8216;traditional marriage&#8217; only the heavily adulterated version we have today. Aside from that, why on earth would Mr Leigh be &#8216;astonished&#8217; that his left-liberal party is pursuing left-liberal legislation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Statement by Edward Leigh on Same-sex Marriage &amp; Civil Partnerships by Tory</title>
		<link>http://cornerstone-group.org.uk/2011/02/17/statement-by-edward-leigh/#comment-1889</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cornerstonegroup.wordpress.com/?p=1749#comment-1889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt;&gt;&gt; I feel I ought to reply on the idea that it is one’s “personal whims” that cause one to marry &lt;&lt;&gt;&gt;I suspect that Mr Leigh knows he is fighting in the last ditch on this issue, just as he was one of the small minority&lt;&lt;&lt;

Congratulations. A vociferous minority gets their own way… again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;&gt; I feel I ought to reply on the idea that it is one’s “personal whims” that cause one to marry &lt;&lt;&gt;&gt;I suspect that Mr Leigh knows he is fighting in the last ditch on this issue, just as he was one of the small minority&lt;&lt;&lt;</p>
<p>Congratulations. A vociferous minority gets their own way… again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Statement by Edward Leigh on Same-sex Marriage &amp; Civil Partnerships by Tory</title>
		<link>http://cornerstone-group.org.uk/2011/02/17/statement-by-edward-leigh/#comment-1888</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cornerstonegroup.wordpress.com/?p=1749#comment-1888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marriage is a religious institution - this is an incontrovertible fact. Partnerships give the veneer of marriage, but it isn&#039;t marriage in itself; likewise, atheists who &#039;marry&#039; flatter themselves with the pretence of &#039;marriage&#039;, and yet marriage has always been the practice of vouchsafing ones love and duty to their betrothed in the face of a Greater Authority: God; in the absence of belief, such acts become a mere pantomime, a societal habit that&#039;s adhered to from a long-lost cultural more – it’s actually quite ironic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marriage is a religious institution &#8211; this is an incontrovertible fact. Partnerships give the veneer of marriage, but it isn&#8217;t marriage in itself; likewise, atheists who &#8216;marry&#8217; flatter themselves with the pretence of &#8216;marriage&#8217;, and yet marriage has always been the practice of vouchsafing ones love and duty to their betrothed in the face of a Greater Authority: God; in the absence of belief, such acts become a mere pantomime, a societal habit that&#8217;s adhered to from a long-lost cultural more – it’s actually quite ironic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Statement by Edward Leigh on Same-sex Marriage &amp; Civil Partnerships by Harry</title>
		<link>http://cornerstone-group.org.uk/2011/02/17/statement-by-edward-leigh/#comment-1887</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cornerstonegroup.wordpress.com/?p=1749#comment-1887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Tory

I feel I ought to reply on the idea that it is one&#039;s &quot;personal whims&quot; that cause one to marry. My husband and I are a rather conservative middle aged professional couple. we married (entered into a civil partnership, if you insist, but no-one uses the term) not because we wished to rub the Christians&#039; noses into anything or particularly have a go at the traditionalists, but in order (first) to ensure that each us had rights if anything happened to us; and secondly, for mutual help and society one ought to have of the other (I quote the BCP from memory and that doesn&#039;t by the way make it a religious institution); and thirdly as a public statement of our lifelong commitment to each other.  &quot;Marriage&quot; is the name we have for monogamous pair bonding, and it is not (like all legal relationships) to be reserved in a discriminatory way for heterosexuals.  

I suspect that Mr Leigh knows he is fighting in the last ditch on this issue, just as he was one of the small minority that fought against the Civil Partnership legislation in 2004. I will bet any poster on this thread that he is in an even smaller minority when this legislation passes later int he lifetime of this Parliament.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tory</p>
<p>I feel I ought to reply on the idea that it is one&#8217;s &#8220;personal whims&#8221; that cause one to marry. My husband and I are a rather conservative middle aged professional couple. we married (entered into a civil partnership, if you insist, but no-one uses the term) not because we wished to rub the Christians&#8217; noses into anything or particularly have a go at the traditionalists, but in order (first) to ensure that each us had rights if anything happened to us; and secondly, for mutual help and society one ought to have of the other (I quote the BCP from memory and that doesn&#8217;t by the way make it a religious institution); and thirdly as a public statement of our lifelong commitment to each other.  &#8220;Marriage&#8221; is the name we have for monogamous pair bonding, and it is not (like all legal relationships) to be reserved in a discriminatory way for heterosexuals.  </p>
<p>I suspect that Mr Leigh knows he is fighting in the last ditch on this issue, just as he was one of the small minority that fought against the Civil Partnership legislation in 2004. I will bet any poster on this thread that he is in an even smaller minority when this legislation passes later int he lifetime of this Parliament.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

